AGENTIC INITIAL STUDIO

Steel loading.
Multi-agent coordination.

A software and research project connecting data preparation, loading optimisation, agent coordination, and human oversight.

MP-02 / Interactive case

Explore the result.
Inspect the decisions.

A completed planning run, brought into an interactive dashboard. Explore the regional map, inspect wagon layouts, and compare four strategy agents.

Open interactive case ↗

486 products · 18 regions · 81 planned wagons

Synthetic product data. Precomputed results, with no live model calls.

The challenge

A loading plan has to do more
than fit the products.

Steel loading combines competing objectives with strict physical constraints. A useful plan must account for capacity, geometry, destination grouping, and changing operating conditions — and give people enough evidence to review the result.

Capabilities

One connected decision workflow.

01

Structured data intake

Inspect Excel or JSON input, identify missing fields, and review proposed repairs before planning.

02

Constraint-aware optimisation

Generate feasible plans and check weight, boundaries, overlap, and complete product coverage.

03

Multi-agent evaluation

An optional council compares strategy-specialised candidates, rejects invalid plans, and ranks valid alternatives.

04

Human approval

Keep technical validation separate from operational approval, with explicit plan states and versions.

05

Dynamic replanning

Respond to product changes or wagon availability, with partial and full replanning strategies.

06

Reviewable evidence

Connect loading layouts, validation summaries, plan history, and audit artifacts to the persisted result.

Architecture

Separate responsibilities.
Keep the evidence connected.

A React interface talks to the Python API. An independent worker executes planning tasks against shared persistent state; model assistance is optional.

01Data intake

Inspect and confirm a canonical input.

02API & queue

Submit a durable, traceable job.

03Worker & agents

Build and compare candidate plans.

04Validation

Check the result independently.

05Human approval

Review before activating the plan.

Where LLM and RAG fit

Optional model assistance supports ambiguous input interpretation and evidence-grounded strategy advice. The optimiser and independent validator remain responsible for physical feasibility; a model response does not replace those checks.

Engineering beyond a single run

Durable jobs, versioned plans, artifact integrity checks, and independent worker execution make the result easier to inspect and recover. This page describes the project design, not a claim of production customer deployment.

Give your project a clear starting point.

Explore the engagement process or prepare your project brief.

Website privacy

This page has no enquiry form, analytics service, or third-party font requests. Your language, appearance, and motion preferences are stored locally in this browser when storage is available.

If the site is hosted, the hosting provider may process standard request logs. Any future contact service will need its own information handling details.